if your post takes less than 1 minute to think of and type, then you probably have no reason posting it in my thread.
now for the fun stuff!!
solo players: can someone shed some insight for me as to why these people think they are the gods of all gametypes? solo, from my perspective, is cumulative to nothing but the same mindless tactics repeated over and over, and all opponents that i've seen are virtually the same as they all use similar tactics, unit combinations, and micro styles to one another. so when i play i'm basically stuck in a pendular cycle with the only variation being ability to micro.
but if we look at micro ability from an analytic, rather than egotistic point of view, we begin to realize that it is completely variant upon something i'll call rustiness here. the more you mass games with similar tactics, the better your micro becomes when executing these tactics. there's something that i'd call intuitive micro which is largely responsibie for micro-specific adaptability (i.e. being able to work with watcha got, even if your army doesn't consist of 8 bears versus fiends or 25 dryads versus destroyers+gargs)
for those of you who are still following me, we can expand this micro-specific adaptability to strategic adaptability, being able to work with what you have to devise a gameplan toward high chances of success, i.e. being able to deploy units to their full effectiveness EVEN IF your orc army doesn't have a blademaster with boots of speed and 3 claws of attack and a circlet.
it is this strategic-specific adaptability, combined with mediocre micro-specific adaptability that i am seeking in a loser male player with no life, who is also seeking a long-term arranged team partner.
contact me via this thread. and for all your dumbf@gs who want to post smart-ass comments, i've heard it all and probabyl will not be impressed. spare yourself the effort.
|
|
