World of Warcraft
Post

Subject:

  •  

  • You are not allowed to post in this station

  • You can make new forum topic(s).

    New forum topics are accrued every minute(s) up to a maximum of topic(s).

Message:

Help keep these forums a fun and safe place for everyone - please report any Code of Conduct violations you see, including:

  • Threats of violence. We take these seriously and will alert the proper authorities.
  • Posts containing personal information about other players. Physical/email addresses, phone numbers, and inappropriate photos and/or videos.
  • Harassing or discriminatory language. This will not be tolerated.
  • In Response To:
Ourlady-craft
  • Level: 3 Random Team
  • Gateway: Azeroth
  • 17. Re: I discovered a mistake on war3 strategy g   03/05/2009 06:08:26 AM PST
quote reply
Q u o t e:


http://tft.replayers.com/index.php?action=view&id=46491

you theory, I prove.

MK is impotent in large scale games. Hes only useful in tiny 1v1 with low amounts of towers, ie, normal games. In an actual tower-mass, he can't do ##@% for the entire game. Meanwhile flame strike is the #1 counter to siege units, and 12 griffs + penix focusing a hero prevents them from aoeing your towers. An MK on the other hand, does what? Stuns their lich for a few seconds while the DK just coils him back? Banish kills lich in a single volley


oh and flame strike is the only way you can stop mass tanks + cloud support. Actually, flame strike just plain counters tanks pretty hardcore.


Wow here I was giving you the benefit of doubt. Instead what do I find? You link me to a 4v4 replay of mass noobs/ that not only is from an outdated patch but a map of friends. Your theory doesn't hold at all. I wonder what happens when a lvl 10 bloodmage gets whacked by a lvl 3 bolt and focused by mass air, don't know but something inside me tells me that he will not cast flamestrike.
-A Karune Fan
Forum Index
Blizzard Entertainment