World of Warcraft
Post

Subject:

  •  

  • You are not allowed to post in this station

  • You can make new forum topic(s).

    New forum topics are accrued every minute(s) up to a maximum of topic(s).

Message:

Help keep these forums a fun and safe place for everyone - please report any Code of Conduct violations you see, including:

  • Threats of violence. We take these seriously and will alert the proper authorities.
  • Posts containing personal information about other players. Physical/email addresses, phone numbers, and inappropriate photos and/or videos.
  • Harassing or discriminatory language. This will not be tolerated.
  • In Response To:
Munthassem-khan
  • USEast
  • 13. Re: My deserted little corner of the internet   06/17/2011 08:06:25 AM PDT
quote reply
Q u o t e:
I can't go back to the D3 forums. I haven't gotten over myself for thinking the Demon Hunter was just a retooled and manga'd up Assassin. Especially with the dual crossbows.

Q u o t e:
I agree, I think the demon hunter was the most poorly planned class. It just doesn't fit the feel of the Diablo series. They could have made a crossbow wielding hero under a much better name, without making them look like they're from a Final Fantasy game. And the glowing eyes are just lame.

it has been defended by many - "what do want to play the same old medieval/fantasy characters?".
YES. YES I DO!
when i'm playing a western shooter i don't want lasers.
barbarians, amazons(bow class/spear class) wizards/sorcerers are "the classics".
necromancer is really just another (dark) magic user.
never cared much for paladins(holy crusaders),assasins(meh),druids(lycanthropy).
now D3.
witch doctor?
monk?
demon hunter?
if you've played torchlight, you know where RPG gaming is headed.
dumb it down and cartoon it up!
"Khan is another name for King, so his real name is likely just Munthassem."
Forum Index
Blizzard Entertainment