World of Warcraft
Post

Subject:

  •  

  • You are not allowed to post in this station

  • You can make new forum topic(s).

    New forum topics are accrued every minute(s) up to a maximum of topic(s).

Message:

Help keep these forums a fun and safe place for everyone - please report any Code of Conduct violations you see, including:

  • Threats of violence. We take these seriously and will alert the proper authorities.
  • Posts containing personal information about other players. Physical/email addresses, phone numbers, and inappropriate photos and/or videos.
  • Harassing or discriminatory language. This will not be tolerated.
  • In Response To:
Lizard666
  • USEast
  • 46. Re: The inefficiency of Diablo3's Development   02/10/2011 11:03:36 AM PST
quote reply
Q u o t e:


True, but after people buy it, and they keep playing it, that means it's good.

I'm still playing WoW after 6 years, and I still dabble with Starcraft 2. More then I can say for most RTS I get. (I'm a beat it and leave it guy for RTS).

And as far as games go, what I like isn't what you like. I like everything Blizz has made to date. Thus, I have no reason to see why I should worry.

You might not get the same result. I don't really care what you think, so far as I'm curious WHY you think it. And in return, I share what/why I think.

It's not religion, geez.


Hedging bets isn't a bad idea, but it's a completely new game, and Blizzard isn't foolproof - as seen by how long it's taken to produce an ARPG compared to how long it took them to make WoW, or other companies to make MMORPGs, or... any other game.

New game, new way of making it, the only reason they're able to take this long is because of the bank account that's funding it.
~If you watch Jaws in reverse, it's about this shark that throws up so many people they had to open a beach because of it.
Forum Index
Blizzard Entertainment